Geographical Inequalities in Land Degradation Research: Evidence from Spatio-Temporal Analysis in Nepal

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Land degradation is a major challenge to sustainable development in Nepal’s fragile mountain and lowland environments. This study synthesizes five decades (1970s–2024) of research, analyzing 764 peer-reviewed articles with explicit spatial coverage. Literature was categorized thematically (ecological, climate/hydrological, geomorphological, socio-economic, political, and development oritend), geographically (physiography, river basins, provinces), and temporally (pre-1993, 1993–2015, post-2015). GIS-based spatial digitization enabled intersection analysis, zonal statistics, and frequency mapping to quantify research density and variation. Statistical tests, including Welch’s ANOVA, Games–Howell post-hoc, and Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparisons, evaluated differences across regions and periods, revealing the evolution, spatial biases, and thematic trends in Nepal’s land degradation research. Results reveal a pronounced increase in research output over time, with exponential growth after 2015, alongside significant spatial and thematic unevenness. Research is strongly clustered in the Chure/Siwalik and Tarai landscapes, the Bagmati and Koshi basins, and densely populated central regions, while the Middle and High Mountain regions, Karnali and Mahakali basins, and western Nepal remain under-studied. Ecological and geomorphic perspectives dominate the literature, whereas socio-cultural and development-focused studies receive comparatively limited attention. Despite increasing alignment with global sustainability frameworks, notable geographic and thematic gaps persist. Using a spatial–temporal and thematic lens, it identifies key research biases and gaps, and outlines priorities for more balanced, policy-relevant, and climate-resilient land management scholarship.

Article activity feed