Prospective surveillance of acute febrile illness in two tertiary health facilities in Nigeria, March 2021-September 2022

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Most infectious diseases present as acute febrile illness (AFI). Diagnostic gaps in most resource-constrained countries contribute to disproportionate disease burden, antimicrobial misuse, and poor epidemic preparedness. Understanding the etiology and epidemiology of AFI improves early warning systems for epidemic-prone pathogens and supports routine updates of the priority pathogen list. We describe the results of sentinel AFI surveillance in Nigeria. Methods: Hospital-based sentinel surveillance was implemented at Asokoro District Hospital, Abuja, and Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Anambra, from 29 March 2021 to 29 September 2022. Blood specimens from patients ≥2 years old with a temperature≥37.5°C or self-reported fever for 2-7 days of unknown etiology were tested using AFI TaqMan® Array Card (TAC) assays to detect 36 pathogens. Results: In this exploratory phase, only 393 of 2,155 specimens were tested due to limited funding and high TAC cost. The majority (62%) of participants tested were adults (246/393), and 52% were female (205/393). The top ten ranked pathogens of the 32 identified were West Nile virus (39%), Zika virus (17%), SARS-CoV-2 (16%), adenovirus (16%), Brucella (8%), Chikungunya virus (7%), Burkholderia (6%), Plasmodium vivax (6%), Plasmodium falciparum (6%), and Crimean Congo Hemorrhagic Fever virus (4%). Coinfections were detected in 45% (178/393) of patients; 24% (94/393) had two pathogens, 21% (84/393) had three or more, and one patient had eight. Conclusion: This pilot study of AFI etiologies in Nigeria suggests emerging and re-emerging viruses are more common than malaria parasites. Co-infection in nearly half of cases warrants further investigation and supports investment in multiplex testing to address diagnostic gaps. The utility of TAC for exploratory studies in low-income settings may be limited by its prohibitive cost. These findings emphasize the need for continued investment in cost-effective diagnostic technologies and enhanced multi-pathogen surveillance systems, essential to early detection and response to epidemic-prone infections.

Article activity feed