Association Between Time-to-Antibiotics and Clinical Outcomes in Neutropenic Fever After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Guidelines recommend empiric antibiotics within one hour for neutropenic fever, extrapolated primarily from sepsis literature. Whether modest variation in time-to-antibiotics (TTA) affects outcomes in antibiotic-naïve hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients remains unclear. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of neutropenic fever episodes occurring within 30 days of HSCT at a single academic center (2018–2022). We included antibiotic-naïve episodes (no intravenous antibiotics in the 24 hours preceding fever) with timestamp-validated TTA. Primary outcome was clinical deterioration (new vasopressor requirement ≥6 hours, mechanical ventilation, or 90-day mortality). Secondary analyses examined bacteremia and blood culture yield. Results: Among 224 antibiotic-naïve episodes, 17 (7.6%) experienced clinical deterioration. Median TTA was 1.2 hours (IQR 0.8–2.2). TTA was not associated with deterioration (adjusted OR 1.03 per hour, 95% CI 0.85–1.24, P=.79). In the full cohort (N=272), bacteremia occurred in 81 episodes (29.8%) and was not associated with 90-day mortality (adjusted OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.38–4.09, P=.72); findings were similar when restricted to true bacterial pathogens (OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.40–6.78, P=.49). Of 15 deaths, 14 (93%) occurred without preceding acute deterioration. Pre-antibiotic cultures had numerically higher positivity than post-antibiotic cultures (33.7% vs 23.5%; adjusted OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.21–2.39, P=.57), though small number of post-antibiotic cultures limits conclusions. Conclusion: In antibiotic-naïve HSCT recipients with neutropenic fever, we found no significant associations between TTA and clinical deterioration or between bacteremia and mortality. These hypothesis-generating findings suggest that in closely monitored patients receiving rapid empiric therapy, modest timing variation may not critically influence outcomes.

Article activity feed