Outcomes of Treatment for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains a therapeutic challenge. Vancomycin is the recommended first-line therapy; however, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SMX-TMP) presents a potential alternative due to its pharmacokinetic properties and cost-effectiveness. Clinical data supporting its use in VAP are limited. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with MRSA-VAP treated with SMX-TMP versus vancomycin. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center, cross-sectional study between January 2020 and July 2021 at a tertiary academic hospital in southern Brazil. Adult patients with confirmed MRSA-VAP and documented susceptibility to both SMX-TMP and vancomycin were included. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included clinical response at day 5, ICU and hospital length of stay, and VAP duration. Statistical comparisons were made using chi-square and t-tests, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: A total of 125 patients were analyzed (vancomycin: n=60; SMX-TMP: n=65). Mortality was 37% in the vancomycin group versus 28% in the SMX-TMP group ( p = 0.285). Clinical cure at day 5 was similar (52% vs. 55%, respectively). No significant differences were observed in SOFA scores, ICU or hospital stay, or VAP duration between groups. Conclusion: SMX-TMP was associated with clinical outcomes comparable to vancomycin in patients with MRSA-VAP. These findings suggest SMX-TMP may represent a viable therapeutic alternative in selected patients. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate its role in this context.

Article activity feed