Development and External Validation of the SANTANDER Score: A Primary Care Clinical Decision Tool for Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Colombia

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of mortality in Colombia [1,2]. Existing risk scores require laboratory parameters not readily available in resource-limited primary care settings. We developed and validated a simplified clinical decision tool using point-of-care glucose testing. Methods: Cross-sectional study using cardiovascular risk assessment databases from four Colombian municipalities (2023-2025). Derivation cohort: 742 patients from El Peñón and Sucre. External validation: 255 patients from Matanza and Vetas [12]. Primary outcome: guideline-defined high cardiovascular risk (ESC 2021 [9]/ACC-AHA 2019 [10]). Performance assessed using discrimination (AUC), calibration, and decision curve analysis [13]. The SANTANDER Score clinical decision pathway is illustrated in Figure 1, showing the complete workflow from data collection through risk stratification and management recommendations. Results: Seven predictors retained: age (OR 1.08, 95%CI 1.06-1.10), male sex (OR 1.85, 95%CI 1.32-2.59), systolic BP (OR 1.03 per 10 mmHg), BMI (OR 1.12), glucose (OR 1.02 per 10 mg/dL), family history (OR 2.34, 95%CI 1.67-3.28), smoking (OR 2.91, 95%CI 1.89-4.48). AUC: 0.760 (derivation), 0.701 (validation). Superior calibration vs Framingham (slope 0.98 vs 0.76, p<0.001), indicating Framingham overestimates risk by approximately 8 percentage points, translating to greater net benefit (0.124 vs 0.108). Annual savings: $95,250 per 10,000 patients.

Article activity feed