Russia as a Microcosm of Arctic Decarbonization: A Data-Driven Framework for Region- Specific Climate Policy in Federated Systems

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

The emission of greenhouse gases (GHG) in the Russia’s Arctic, accelerates warming twice the current global rate, making it a crucial framework for countries with similar decarbonization policies. This study employed a dynamic approach towards identifying regional heterogeneity by integrating spatial correlation analysis, Monte Carlo simulation, and optimization of cost-benefit in climate policies. We observed a clear disparity in Moscow’s CO 2 emissions (24%) associated with aviation activities, and largest mean projection (1,300 kg CO 2 eq) predicted to have considerably higher CO 2 levels than any region. Policy scenario analysis showed that cities with a higher auto footprint total (Ufa, St. Petersburg, and Vladivostok) have a higher value (5.3–5.4%) in total CO 2 compared to cities with lower contributions such as Kaluga, Vladimir, and Tomsk (4.0-4.9%). Using Monte Carlo simulation we modeled regional heterogeneity in Russian cities, the result showed a 15% auto tax reduction in Moscow and coal-to-gas switching grants (20–24%) in Tomsk is cost-effective (benefit-cost ratio 2.1–2.8). Auto tax is the most cost-effective policy as it provides the most CO 2 reduction per unit cost. In Arctic city such as Norilsk whose Arctic Energy Poverty Risk Index (AEPRI = 0.81) has critical risk level, we recommend an immediate transition to waste-heat recycling and geothermal heating to eliminate energy poverty and encourage sustainable development. Beyond 2030, we recommend a transition to Reykjavik and Umea’s clean and resilient climate policies in high-risk regions and other federated systems to ensure equity in energy transitions.

Article activity feed