Inequity by Design: Systematic Appraisal of the (in)Equities in Agriculture-Nutrition-Health Research Practices

Research practices in agriculture, nutrition, and health (ANH) shape outcomes on food security and nutrition (FSN). Inequitable research practices reflect power imbalances between institutions and communities, privilege Global North institutions, and are linked to poor FSN outcomes. We used a systematic scoping review to map (in) equitable research practices across the ANH research continuum (from agenda-setting to dissemination, collaboration, funding, and authorship). From five databases, 572 articles met inclusion criteria. Fostering research partnerships and community engagement were the most discussed steps along the research continuum (40%). "Authentic partnering" and "inclusion" were the most emphasized equity principles. Over one-third of articles provided practical tools to promote equity-centered research, including frameworks for community engagement, collaborative funding models, and inclusive authorship practices. Findings reveal both a characterization of equity challenges in ANH research and emerging pathways toward more just practices. Making research practices more equitable will drive FSN actions toward better outcomes and just food systems transformations.