Long-term Effectiveness of PCSK9 Inhibitors versus Ezetimibe as Adjunctive Therapy to Statins in Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A TriNetX Database Analysis

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Purpose: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains a leading cause of mortality. While statins are the cornerstone of therapy, many patients require intensification. This study compares the long-term real-world effectiveness of adding a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor versus ezetimibe to background statin therapy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network (January 2018–January 2023). We identified adult patients with established ASCVD on statin therapy initiating either a PCSK9 inhibitor or ezetimibe. Propensity score matching (1:1) was utilized to balance baseline demographics, comorbidities, and medications, resulting in 16,145 patients per group. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 3 and 5 years. Secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, revascularization, and hospital readmission. Results The PCSK9 inhibitor cohort demonstrated a significant reduction in all-cause mortality compared to the ezetimibe cohort at 3 years (OR: 0.78, HR: 0.79, p < 0.001) and 5 years (OR: 0.78, HR: 0.79, p < 0.001). All-cause readmissions were also lower in the PCSK9 inhibitor group (5-year OR: 0.89, p = 0.01; HR: 0.95, p = 0.15). Conversely, rates of MI were higher in the PCSK9 inhibitor group at 5 years (OR: 1.11, p = 0.03; HR: 1.10, p = 0.03), likely reflecting channeling bias due to higher baseline risk (residual LDL-C imbalance). Conclusion In this large real-world analysis, PCSK9 inhibitor use was associated with lower all-cause mortality and fewer hospital readmissions over 5 years compared with ezetimibe, despite preferential use in a higher-risk population. These findings are observational and hypothesis-generating, highlighting the impact of treatment channeling in real-world lipid-lowering therapy and the need for further studies with cause-specific outcome adjudication.

Article activity feed