Effectiveness and Safety of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Elderly Patients (≥75 Years) with Diabetes: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) is rising globally, especially among older adults, creating unique management challenges due to increased susceptibility to adverse drug reactions and multiple comorbidities. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have shown cardioprotective and renoprotective effects, but their safety and efficacy in elderly populations, particularly those aged ≥ 75 years, remain under-explored. Methods In this multi-center retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Medical System in Taiwan, focusing on diabetic patients aged ≥ 75 years between 2012 and 2021. Initially, 33,964 patients were screened. After serial exclusions, a total of 2,089 patients were included, with 1,000 in the SGLT2i group and 2,000 in the non-SGLT2i group, matched 1:2 by key variables. Clinical outcomes, including all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) death, heart failure (HF) hospitalization, worsening renal function, and urinary tract infections (UTIs), were compared between groups over a maximum 5-year follow-up, with a minimum follow-up of one year. Results The final cohort had a mean age of 83.5 ± 4.2 years, with 78.7% of patients aged 75–85 and 6.6% aged > 90 years. After inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), SGLT2i use was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (6.1% vs. 11.3%, p < 0.05) and a lower incidence of worsening renal function (12.9% vs. 16.3%, p < 0.05). Cardiovascular mortality (1.6% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.08) and HF hospitalization rates (8.9% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.75) showed no significant differences between the groups. Notably, the reduced risk of renal decline was more pronounced in those aged 75–85 years, while benefits appeared to diminish in patients over 85 years. UTI incidence was similar between SGLT2i and non-SGLT2i users (5.7% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.64), suggesting no increased risk. Subgroup analysis highlighted that SGLT2i maintained benefits on all-cause mortality and renal outcomes in most elderly subgroups, but careful consideration is needed for the very elderly (> 85 years). Conclusion SGLT2i treatment in elderly DM patients aged ≥ 75 years was associated with improved all-cause mortality and renal outcomes without increasing the risk of UTIs. The effectiveness of SGLT2i may decrease in very elderly patients (> 85 years), suggesting careful patient selection is required in this subgroup.

Article activity feed