Incremental Value of Delayed [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/MR in the Detection of Liver Metastases from Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: [ 68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT has been widely used in the diagnosis and staging of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), while PET/MR may have greater advantages in the diagnosis of hepatic lesions. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of conventional [ 68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and delayed PET/MR in detecting hepatic metastases in patients with GEP-NETs. Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled GEP-NETs patients with liver metastases who underwent conventional [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT followed by delayed PET/MR of the upper abdomen on the same day. Contrast-enhanced MRI served as the reference standard. Lesion detection rates, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), target-to-background ratio (TBR), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared between the two modalities. Results: 46 patients (mean age 56.4±12.9 years, 18 males and 28 females) were included. A total of 542 liver metastases were identified, with PET/CT detecting 368 (67.9%) lesions and delayed PET/MR contributing an additional 146 (94.8%) lesions. For matched lesions, SUVmax and TBR values showed no statistically significant differences between PET/CT and delayed PET/MR imaging (17.2 ± 11.0 vs. 16.4 ± 10.8, P = 0.746; 4.1 ± 3.6 vs. 4.0 ± 2.8, P = 0.178, respectively). For additional lesions detected on delayed PET/MR, 54 high‑uptake liver metastases were identified (mean diameter 4.7 ± 1.9 mm; SUVmax 9.1 ± 2.2), along with 92 non‑uptake lesions (mean diameter 5.5 ± 2.3 mm; Z = –2.149, P  = 0.0315). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy between conventional PET/CT and delayed PET/MR were (65.9% vs. 92.4%, P <0.001), (59.3% vs. 51.9%, P =0.77) and (65.6% vs.90.5%, P <0.001), respectively. Conclusion: Delayed PET/MR exhibits superior efficacy in detecting liver metastases compared to conventional PET/CT. The combined strategy of [ 68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT and delayed PET/MR provides a more sensitive and precise approach for detecting liver metastases in patients with GEP-NETs.

Article activity feed