The Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT Multiparameter for Prognostic Assessment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective To establish a quantitative model using 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET/CT) parameters for the evaluation of prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods A total of 110 patients with NSCLC in our hospital from March 2019 to October 2021 were prospectively included, according to the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system, they were divided into 25 cases with stage I, 49 cases with stage II, and 36 cases with stage III. After 6 months of follow-up, 32 patients occurred tumor progression and 78 patients had non-tumor progression. The demographic information (sex, age, hypertension, and diabetes), tumor pathology (pathological classification and histological grade), imaging [tumor location, diameter, TNM stage, standard uptake value (SUV) max and SUV mean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG)] were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with non-tumor progression group, age, tumor diameter, TNM stage, SUVmax, SUV mean, MTV and TLG in tumor progression group increased, low-histological differentiation increased(P < 0.05). Non collinearity indexes were screened based on LASSO regression to obtain TNM stage, SUVmax, MTV and TLG. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that stage III (HR = 5.264,95% CI = 4.421 ~ 7.648, P < 0.001), SUVmax (HR = 3.621,95% CI = 2.754 ~ 5.022, P < 0.001), MTV (HR = 3.009,95% CI = 2.323 ~ 4.457, P < 0.001) and TLG (HR = 2.659,95% CI = 1.859 ~ 3.523, P < 0.001) were the independent risk factors to tumor progression of NSCLC patients. Establish the quantitative model Y= -0.231 + 1.958×(phase III) + 1.323×(SUVmax) + 1.085 ×(MTV) + 0.859 ×(TLG). Receiver operating curve (ROC) showed that area under the curve (AUC) by the model for predicting tumor progression was 0.859 (95% CI = 0.801 ~ 0.956, P < 0.001). The calibration curve and decision curve showed that the consistency and benefit of the model were good. Conclusion 18 F-FDG PET/CT is an important imaging tool to evaluate the prognosis of NSCLC patients, measuring multiple parameters SUVmax. MTV and TLG are closely related to the risk of tumor progression. Establishing a quantitative model combined with TNM staging to predict tumor progression, which has good clinical value.

Article activity feed