The Green Paradox in Resource-Dependent Regions: Heterogeneous Impacts of Environmental Regulation on Carbon Lock-in Subtitle: Evidence from Double Machine Learning in China's Yellow River Basin

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Resource-based cities in the Global South universally face a "dual dilemma" of sustaining economic growth while breaking path-dependent carbon lock-in. As a critical energy basin in China, the low-carbon transition of the Yellow River Basin is pivotal for achieving national carbon neutrality goals. However, debate persists regarding whether the "Yellow River Basin Ecological Protection and High-Quality Development Strategy" (implemented in 2019) effectively disrupts this high-carbon dependency. Existing studies often rely on linear models, ignoring the high-dimensional non-linear confounders typical of complex eco-economic systems, potentially masking the true "Green Paradox" effects. Treating this strategy as a quasi-natural experiment, this study employs a Double Machine Learning (DML) causal inference framework on a long-term panel dataset (2000–2023) covering 938 counties. This approach utilizes orthogonalization techniques to effectively eliminate the interference of 75 high-dimensional confounding variables. The findings reveal: (1) Aggregate Effect: The strategy significantly reduced carbon intensity on average (ATE = -0.058, p<0.01). (2) Green Paradox Confirmation: Dynamic analysis reveals that emissions did not decline immediately; instead, a short-term rebound occurred initially (t=0, t=1), confirming the existence of "intertemporal arbitrage" behaviors. (3) Asymmetric Mechanism: Decomposition analysis indicates that emission reductions were primarily "Efficiency-driven" (diluting intensity via innovation, Coef = -0.290) rather than "Structure-driven". Notably, the industrial structure coefficient showed a short-term resilience (Coef = +0.032), suggesting that high-carbon industries were not "washed out" but rather locked in due to structural rigidity. Conclusion: While top-down environmental strategies act as an effective "brake" for expanding economies, declining regions require complementary "Just Transition" mechanisms to avoid falling into a low-carbon poverty trap.

Article activity feed