Prospective Comparison of Micro-osteoperforations and Miniscrew Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion in Maxillary Transverse Deficiency

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Introduction: This prospective study compared the efficacy of micro-osteoperforations-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MOP-RPE) and miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) for treating maxillary transverse deficiency (MTD) in skeletally mature patients. Methods: Thirteen adults with MTD were allocated to MOP-RPE (n=7, 22.14± 5.40) or MARPE (n=6, 21.50 ± 4.04) groups. MOP-RPE employed corticopunctures guided by 3D-printed guide plate, while MARPE used four paramedian miniscrews, followed by custom palatal expansion appliances.Skeletal/dental changes were quantified via pre-/post-expansion CBCT. Root resorption was assessed via 3D volumetric analysis; patient satisfaction and pain were evaluated anonymously. Results: Both groups achieved significant transverse expansion (P<0.05) with no intergroup differences in skeletal expansion and a higher dental expansion in MARPE group. MOP-PRE demonstrated greater proportional skeletal contribution at the posterior maxilla and reduced proportion of dental compensation; similar phenomena were also observed in the anterior section. Root resorption was comparable between groups (P>0.05). Patient-reported outcomes showed equivalent satisfaction and pain levels. Conclusions: MOP-RPE achieved satisfying total expansion, higher skeletal and smaller dental proportion to MARPE while minimizing dental side effects and eliminating miniscrew-related complications, offering a viable minimally invasive alternative for adult MTD.

Article activity feed