The great potential of novel imaging agent in the diagnosis of gallbladder cancer: a prospective study comparing [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis. Accurate staging is critical for treatment planning, but [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT has limited value due to high hepatic background and difficulty distinguishing inflammation from malignancy. [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT offers higher tumor-to-background contrast and low physiological uptake in normal tissues. This study was to investigate the value and the impact on clinical staging management of [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 comparing with [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT in patients with gallbladder cancer. This prospective study recruited patients who underwent ultrasound or MRI and were considered to have primary or recurrence GBC. All patients underwent [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT within one week of each other. Final histopathology, imaging, and follow-up results were used as reference standards. The tumor/background ratio (TBR) and maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) between [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [ 18 F]FDG in primary tumors, distant metastases, lymph nodes, and peritoneal metastases were used to compare the difference. Results: A total of 17 patients were included in the study, of whom 13 patients with primary tumors of GBC were positive for [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 (100% detection rate), while [ 18 F]FDG detected 12 of them (92% detection rate). [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 was more sensitive than [ 18 F]FDG in detecting distant metastases (100% VS. 81%), lymph node metastases (99% VS. 94%) and peritoneal metastases (100% VS. 18%) of GBC. Also [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 had higher SUVmax for distant metastases and lymph nodes than [ 18 F]FDG. There was no significant difference in the uptake of the two tracers in the primary tumors,but the TBR values were significantly higher in [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 than in [ 18 F]FDG . Also [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 identified far more peritoneal metastases than those identified by [ 18 F]FDG. Finally, the staging of two patients was revised upward because of the [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 results, while the staging of the other two patients was revised downward. Conclusions: [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 is more advantageous than [ 18 F]FDG in detecting primary tumors, distant metastases, lymph node metastases, and peritoneal metastases in GBC with higher SUVmax and TBR. Also [ 68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 is more promising for staging of GBC.

Article activity feed