GWAS metanalysis of atrial fibrillation reveals significant sex-related heterogeneity effects of the PITX2 and CFL2 loci
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) exhibits notable sex differences in epidemiology and outcomes. This study investigates biological sex-specific differences in AF through sex-stratified genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and proteomic related analyses. Methods We performed a sex-stratified GWAS meta-analysis using data from the UK Biobank study: 4,375 male AF cases and 162,645 controls; 1,981 female AF cases and 192,193 controls. Significant loci and sex-specific associations were identified, and sex heterogeneity was assessed. Replication was done in an independent cohort of 12,614 individuals (1,207 AF cases, 55% female). Plasma proteomic analyses in 46,724 subjects assessed genotype–sex interactions stratifying by atrial fibrillation status. Heritability estimates and sex-specific polygenic risk scores (PRS) were also calculated. Results Two male-specific loci: CFL2 and ATXN1 were identified. The meta-analysis identified additional 22 known AF loci. Sex heterogeneity was found in 6 of the 24 loci, with TTN and SPATS2L showing stronger effects in females, and NTMT2 , PITX2 , GBF1 , and CFL2 stronger effects in males. Heritability estimation liability was higher in females (h²=0.19) than in males (h²=0.12). PRS performance was similar across sexes (AUC = 0.60–0.63). Replication confirmed heterogeneity for PITX2 and CFL2 , with CFL2 variant associated with AF only in males. Proteomics analyses suggested nominals association such as: myosin light chain 1/3 (MYL1) and biogenesis of lysosomal organelles complex 1 subunit 2 (BLOC1S2). Key associated pathways included SCF-KIT signaling, prolactin signaling, and the RAC1/PAK1/p38/MMP2. Conclusions Our findings indicate significant sex-based heterogeneity in the effects of well-known AF-associated loci. Proteomic-genetic integration suggested sex-specific differences and candidate pathways. Despite this heterogeneity, a sex-specific approach did not significantly enhance PRS prediction, underscoring the need for adequately powered sex-specific GWAS.