Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Evaluation of Nephron Sparing Treatment for Renal Cell Carcinoma

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the accuracy of CEUS in identifying residual or recurrent tumor post nephron-sparing procedures. Materials and Methods: CEUS studies performed post nephron sparing procedure (RFA, cryoablation, MWA, partial nephrectomy) from January 2018 to May 2025 were retrospectively reviewed at 2 centers. Informed consent was waived. Patient charts were reviewed for follow-up procedures and patient status. CEUS studies were performed on a Philips Epic ultrasound with a C5-1 transducer using Lumason with a dose of 1.0 to 2.0cc. A 3-minute cine clip was saved. An examination was considered a true positive if there was contrast in the procedure site and either biopsy proven tumor or persistent enhancement for over 1 year. An examination was considered a true negative if there was no contrast enhancement in the procedure site. Results: There were 193 lesions in 188 patients. (mean age 68.0 years +/- 1.4 [SD] (range 33-90) ;115 men). There were 16 radiofrequency ablation, 38 cryoablations, 4 microwave ablations, and 135 partial nephrectomies. The average lesion size was 2.9cm (IQR 2.2,3.7; range 1.4cm-7.1cm). There were 17 (8.8%) true positive cases and 176 (91.2%) true negative cases. Time of follow-up ranged from 1-336 months (mean 35.1, IQR 12, 70). There were no false positive or false negative cases based on biopsy and long-term follow-up. There were 92 (47.7%) that also had CECT. There was 96.7% concordance of CEUS with CT. There were 3 CEUS cases positive with a negative CECT. Conclusions: CEUS is an accurate method in determining residual or recurrent tumor in patients having nephron sparing procedures.

Article activity feed