Impact of Composite Carbon Policies on Optimal Supply Chain Decisions and Optimization: A Study Based on Stackelberg Game

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

This study constructs a Stackelberg game model of a two-tier supply chain (manufacturer-retailer), endogenizing consumer eco-consciousness into the demand function to holistically examine carbon tax, carbon quota trading, government subsidies, and stochastic demand. It analyzes pricing and emission-reduction decisions under two power structures, deriving equilibrium solutions via backward induction. The key findings of the paper includes : (1) Consumer green preference is pivotal for supply chain decarbonization.(2) Government subsidies incentivize green technology investment, but their efficacy depends on multi-factor synergy, necessitating dynamic policy calibration.(3) Power structures affect profit distribution and emission efficiency, and cost-sharing contracts can coordinate policy impacts.The research provides a theoretical framework for low-carbon supply chain management under multi-policy synergy, recommending governments adopt differentiated carbon policies while firms align green investments with market demand for win-win economic-environmental outcomes.

Article activity feed