Breathe Well, Be Well: Development and Validation of the Perceived Breath Mastery Scale (PBM-S)

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Breathing interventions are a commonly used and effective tool for improving well-being. However, assessments of breathing are seldom included within these interventions, which limits understanding of how specific aspects of breathing contribute to specific changes in well-being. Existing assessments of breathing are not well suited for use in well-being interventions because they typically only capture negative aspects of breathing, such as dysfunction. The present study aimed to address this gap by developing and evaluating the first positive, self-report breathing measure (the Perceived Breath Mastery Scale [PBM-S]). Expert panel review and exploratory factor analysis led to a 3-factor, 23-item scale that showed good structural validity. Criterion, discriminant, incremental, and known-group validity were also established. The PBM-S proved to be a better predictor of flourishing than well-established measures, such as mindfulness and self-efficacy. We also used a machine learning algorithm to construct a 9-item version of the PBM-S and a 12-item version that included dysfunctional breathing as a fourth factor. We recommend using the PBM-S instruments in breathing interventions to deepen insights into the psychological processes they affect and to customize, assess, and enhance interventions for targeted well-being outcomes.

Article activity feed