Psychometric Assessment of the EQ-5D-3L And ReQoL Measures in Secure Care Patients with an Intellectual Disability: Reliability, Agreement, Construct Validity, and Responsiveness

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

PURPOSE. People with intellectual disabilities (PID) are a vulnerable, marginalised group for whom mental ill-health is common. PID who commit criminal offences may require secure inpatient care, within which aggression and violence cause major problems stemming in-part from patients’ psychological distress. To conduct economic evaluations of interventions to aid secure care PID, utility-based measures (e.g., EQ-5D, ReQoL-UI) must be sensitive and responsive to changes in aggression and psychological distress. Within secure care PID, we assess the psychometric properties of the self-reported and proxy-reported EQ-5D-3L (generic health) and ReQoL-UI (recovery-focussed quality-of-life) alongside the clinician-reported MOAS (aggression) and self-reported BSI (psychological distress). We use the self-reported EQ-5D-3L adapted for PID; the ReQoL-10 was also assessed. METHODS. The SCHEMA trial collected measures at baseline, 19- and 38-weeks post-baseline. EQ-5D-3L and ReQoL measures’ inter-rater reliability and agreement between self- and proxy-responses was assessed, with construct validity and responsiveness judged against MOAS and BSI scores and cut-offs, e.g., with/out aggression or psychological distress. RESULTS. Forty-seven adults were randomised (intervention, 24; control, 23). The psychometric results were notably influenced by using self- or proxy-responses. The EQ-5D-3L suggested little heterogeneity among responders. Inter-rater reliability/agreement was: EQ-5D-3L, poor/none; ReQoL-UI, poor/minimal; ReQoL-10, moderate/weak-moderate. The ReQoL-UI/-10 had better construct validity with the MOAS and BSI than the EQ-5D-3L. Responsiveness tended to be larger for the proxy-reported ReQoL-10, albeit trivial to small across all measures. CONCLUSION. Despite the small sample size common with PID research, this study suggests the ReQoL measures might be preferred over the EQ-5D-3L in secure care PID.

Article activity feed