Wind-tunnel simulation study of shelter effects of farmland shelterbelts with different configurations

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

The configuration of farmland shelterbelts plays a crucial role in determining their shelter effects. To optimize the configuration patterns of farmland shelterbelts in Xinjiang, wind tunnel simulation experiments were conducted on six mixed tree-shrub shelterbelt configurations at six different angles between the prevailing wind direction and the main shelterbelt orientation. Results showed that at 90 degrees, Type VI exhibited the strongest windbreak capacity, followed by Type II, while Type I performed the worst, with average shelter efficiencies of 45.5%, 43.3%, and 33.6% respectively. All shelterbelts formed strong deceleration zones within horizontal distances of 1 ~ 3H, with gradual airflow recovery and stabilization occurring at 5 ~ 15H. As the angle between prevailing wind direction and main shelterbelt increased, the protective coverage gradually expanded. For Type II and VI shelterbelts at large angles (≥ 60°), significant differences in average wind speed were observed per 15-degree increment, while no significant differences were found at small angles (≤ 45°). Therefore, when constructing farmland shelterbelts, priority should be given to Type II and VI configurations, and an angle deviation of 0 ~ 30 degrees between prevailing wind direction and main shelterbelt orientation is acceptable. Exceeding this range will reduce the windbreak effectiveness of farmland shelterbelts.

Article activity feed