Impact of Funding Sources on Institutional Performance in Nigerian Higher Education

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

The assessment of university funding adequacy reveals a critical and multifaceted crisis affecting higher education institutions globally. Based on a comprehensive survey, this paper examined ten key operational areas within selected universities. The analysis presents alarming evidence of systematic underfunding across all measured domains, with particularly severe deficiencies in physical infrastructure maintenance and support services. This paper thus leveraged on Donabedian model and SERVQUAL to assess the funding sources available to the Universities. The findings demonstrate that current funding mechanisms are fundamentally inadequate to support the complex operational requirements of modern universities, with profound implications for educational quality, institutional sustainability, and national development goals. Specifically, five major factors were extracted as capable of influencing institutional performance relative to funding. These include finance, employee competencies, infrastructural development, Quality of Service (QoS), and ethical standards. Together, these factors account for 62.12% of the total variance in institutional performance, indicating that they collectively explain a significant proportion of the variability observed across institutions. The multimodal regression used to consolidate the results shows that federal universities tend to have better physical facilities compared to private universities. However, QoS plays a significant role in shaping perceptions of private universities. Employee competence and responsiveness is a key distinguishing factor specifically for state universities. In terms of funding adequacy, state universities are 49.6% more likely than federal universities to be perceived as adequately funded. Private universities stand out even more in this regard, being 280.1% more likely to be considered financially adequate than federal universities. These findings highlight the varying strengths and challenges across federal, state, and private university systems in key performance areas. These insights call for urgent policy reforms and strategic investments to address the disparities in university funding and performance. Strengthening institutional capacity across all sectors is essential to achieving equitable, high-quality higher education aligned with national and developmental priorities.

Article activity feed