Reducing artifacts of arms-down positioning in abdominal CT with artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Purpose: To test the feasibility of an artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction (AIIR) for reducing artifacts of arms-down positioning in abdominal CT. Methods and Materials: This study retrospectively enrolled 49 patients (11 females and 38 males; mean age of 55.0 ± 19.4 years) who were unable to raise their arms during abdominal CT scans. The raw data were reconstructed using three methods: the hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR), the HIR combined with adaptive filtering (HIR+AF), and the AIIR. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) on the liver, kidney, pancreas, and spleen were measured and compared among the three image sets. The arm-artifacts, image contrast, diagnostic acceptability, overall image quality, and lesion sharpness were evaluated by two radiologists using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). Results: The SNRs of AIIR for the liver, kidney, pancreas, and spleen were 6.0 ± 1.7, 3.2 ± 1.1, 4.1 ± 1.4, and 5.4 ± 1.5, respectively, significantly higher than those of HIR (2.4 ± 1.1, 1.4 ± 0.6, 1.8 ± 0.7, and 2.1 ± 1.0) and HIR+AF (4.0 ± 1.2, 2.4 ± 0.9, 3.0 ± 0.9, and 3.7 ± 1.2) (all p < 0.01). Similarly, the CNRs of AIIR for the liver, kidney, pancreas, and spleen were 17.7 ± 3.9, 15.6 ± 3.3, 14.9 ± 3.8, and 18.0 ± 4.9, respectively, significantly higher than those of HIR (6.1 ± 2.4, 5.0 ± 1.9, 5.3 ± 1.9, and 5.7 ± 2.6) and HIR+AF (10.4 ± 2.7, 8.9 ± 2.4, 9.1 ± 2.6, and 10.2 ± 3.7) (all p < 0.01). Compared to HIR and HIR+AF, the AIIR showed the highest image quality scores regarding arm-artifacts, image contrast, diagnostic acceptability, overall image quality, and lesion sharpness (all p < 0.001). Conclusion: AIIR can significantly improve image quality for patients with arms-down positioning in abdominal CT, compared to HIR and HIR+AF.

Article activity feed