Differences in Different Reconstruction Algorithms for Coronary CTA Demonstrating Pericoronary Adipose Tissue Attenuation

Background and objectives The Fat Attenuation Index (FAI) surrounding the coronary arteries, a sensitive biomarker for coronary inflammation, can be measured through standard Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA). The aim of this study is to evaluate the differences in FAI as displayed on CCTA using three different reconstruction algorithms: high-level Deep Learning Image Reconstruction (DLIR-H), Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (ASIR-V), and Filtered Back Projection (FBP).Materials and MethodsBased on the presence or absence of plaque, the population was divided into the following groups: normal, no plaque, non-calcified plaque, mixed plaque, and calcified plaque. Each group was then further analysed according to the reconstruction algorithm, with three subgroups for each: DLIR-H, ASIR-V, and FBP. Attenuation values for pericardial adipose tissue, image noise, and the Fat Attenuation Index (FAI) of the three proximal coronary arteries were measured and evaluated for each of the three reconstruction algorithms. Results The attenuation values of pericardial adipose tissue measured by the three algorithms were not statistically different. However, the FAI measured by DLIR-H was the highest, followed by ASIR-V, with FBP yielding the lowest value; all differences were statistically significant. Meanwhile, DLIR-H demonstrated the strongest ability to reduce image noise, whereas FBP showed the weakest ability to do so. Conclusion FAI varies significantly depending on the algorithm used. Therefore, standardised reconstruction protocols are essential in multicentre and longitudinal studies to ensure accurate, reproducible, and comparable FAI results.