Comparative In-Vitro Evaluation of Torque Accuracy in Spring-Type vs. Toggle-Design Wrenches in Implant Dentistry

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective: This in vitro study compared the accuracy and reliability of spring-type versus toggle-design torque wrenches used in implant dentistry, evaluating torque deviation at clinically relevant settings. Materials and Methods: Twelve new, factory-calibrated torque wrenches (six spring-type and six toggle-design) were tested at two torque levels (spring: 15 and 35 N·cm; toggle: 10 and 30 N·cm). Each device underwent 30 torque applications per setting using a digital torque meter under standardized laboratory conditions. Primary outcomes were mean percentage error, absolute torque deviation (N·cm), and frequency of torque deviations beyond ±0.5% of target. Statistical analysis included Mann-Whitney U tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results: Both wrench types exhibited substantial deviations from manufacturer-specified values, with over 90% of applications exceeding ±0.5% tolerance. Spring-type wrenches showed mean percentage errors of 15.74% at 15 N·cm and 5.06% at 35 N·cm. Toggle-design wrenches demonstrated 14.66% error at 10 N·cm and 7.96% at 30 N·cm. Error frequency was 94.71% for spring-type and 92.5% for toggle-design wrenches. Toggle-design wrenches showed significantly lower absolute error at high torque settings (P = 0.01), but no significant difference in low torque ranges (P = 0.15). Conclusion: Both spring-type and toggle-design torque wrenches exhibit notable torque inaccuracies, especially at lower torque settings. Toggle-design wrenches demonstrated greater accuracy at higher torque levels. Given the high frequency of torque deviation, routine calibration verification and consideration of supplemental verification methods are recommended.

Article activity feed