Comparison of Disaster Management Practices in Indonesia: A Study of Resilience in Garut and Majene Districts

As natural hazards related occur more frequently, disaster management in Indonesia is becoming a more pressing issue. This study compares the disaster management and mitigation methods used in Majene Regency and Garut Regency. Interviews, document analysis, and the exploration of certain crucial facts are all part of the qualitative methodology. Additionally, we used NVivo 12 Plus to visualize the theme analysis. According to the findings, Majene and Garut have put disaster management plans into action, which include community initiatives and municipal laws. However, the absence of comprehensive catastrophe insurance, including both private sector policies and public sector coverage, along with the lack of administrative competence and resources, are the biggest obstacles to effective mitigation. Logistical and access issues in outlying places significantly slowed down the evacuation and relief distribution process during the reaction phase. With an emphasis on debris removal, rehabilitation, and economic and psychological empowerment, post-disaster recovery in both regions also demonstrated the value of cooperation between government agencies, NGOs, private sector, and communities. This research advances disaster management literature by promoting community preparedness, enhancing inter-agency collaboration, and implementing disaster insurance to increase future disaster management efficacy. These findings align with disaster management theories and practices that underscore the need for inter-sectoral collaboration in enhancing community resilience to catastrophes. Clinical trial number: not applicable.