Cost Effective Analysis of Inhalers Used for Asthma Management: An Interventional Approach

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of corticosteroid inhalers, patient counseling, and factors influencing prescribing patterns and medication adherence. Methods: Prospective interventional sampling approach included patients aged 18-60 with asthma, excluding pregnant/lactating women, unwilling patients, and those with communication problems. Patients received counseling on inhaler use. Results: Asthma incidence peaked in patients aged 48+ (30.6%).Upper-middle-class patients predominated (59%). Counseling improved adherence (76.4%). Patient satisfaction was high (47.2%). Pulmonary function test (PFT) values improved post-adherence (84.118±12.647). Fluticasone/Formoterol was the most common inhaler (41.7%). Budesonide/Formoterol had the lowest mean drug cost (Rupees 476.095±119.717). Total cost analysis revealed Fluticasone/Formoterol as most cost-effective (Rupees 5464.547 ± 1015.616). Proper adherence reduced drug costs (Rupees 544.042±398.614 vs. 1154.499 ± 369.435). Conclusion: Fluticasone/Formoterol was the most cost-effective corticosteroid inhaler. Direct patient/caregiver interaction and counseling significantly improved asthma control, medication adherence, and patient satisfaction. Using clear language and visual aids enhanced comprehension.

Article activity feed