The Impact of Reduced Salivary Flow Rate and Aging on Oral Candidiasis in Patients with Stomatitis
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Aim: We elucidated the relationship between the comorbidity of oral candidiasis and stomatitis and a reduced salivary flow rate, and identify predictors for oral candidiasis. Methods: A total of 259 patients with stomatitis (mean age 59.77±15.93 years, range 10 –87 years, 201 females) were diagnosed with oral candidiasis through Candida albicans culture test. Clinical characteristics of the Candida –positive and Candida –negative groups were statistically analyzed. Results: Out of the total 259 stomatitis patients, 81 (31.27%) had oral candidiasis based on Candida albicans culture. Regarding age, the stomatitis with oral candidiasis group (64.25 ± 14.66 years) was significantly older than the stomatitis without oral candidiasis group (57.73 ± 16.10 years) (p=0.002). Regarding salivary flow rates, both unstimulated salivary flow rate (UFR) (0.36 ± 0.32 mL/min vs. 0.47 ± 0.28 mL/min, p=0.006) and stimulated salivary flow rate (SFR) (1.21 ± 0.68 mL/min vs. 1.41 ± 0.69 mL/min, p=0.032) were significantly lower in patients with oral candidiasis compared to those without. The proportion of xerostomia based on UFR 0.2mL/min (xerostomia_UFR) was significantly higher in the stomatitis with oral candidiasis group (49.4%) compared to the stomatitis without oral candidiasis group (18.5%) (p<0.001). Similarly, the proportion of xerostomia based on SFR of 0.7mL/min was significantly higher in the stomatitis with oral candidiasis group (27.2%) compared to the stomatitis without oral candidiasis group (10.7%) (p<0.001). The prediction accuracy of oral candidiasis based on age was 62.2% (AUC=0.622, 95% CI: 0.547-0.696, p=0.002), with a cutoff value of 64.50 years for age. The prediction accuracy based on UFR was 65.8% (AUC=0.658, 95% CI: 0.582-0.734, p<0.001), with a cutoff value of 0.3350 mL/min for UFR. The prediction accuracy based on SFR was 58.7% (AUC=0.587, 95% CI: 0.510-0.663, p=0.025), with a cutoff value of 1.150 mL/min for SFR. From the generalized linear model for oral candidiasis, xerostomia_UFR was significant predictor (B=0.328, 95% CI: 0.177 - 0.480, p<0.001). Conclusion: Although a decrease in salivary flow rate and aging were associated with the occurrence of oral candidiasis in patients with stomatitis, these factors alone did not result in high predictive accuracy.