Association between PM2.5 from a coal mine fire and eosinophilic airway inflammation 7.5 years later

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background and aim: There are few long-term studies of respiratory health effects of landscape fires, despite increasing frequency and intensity due to climate change. We investigated the association between exposure to coal mine fire PM 2.5 and eosinophilic airway inflammation 7.5 years later. Methods Adult residents of Morwell, who were exposed to the 2014 Hazelwood mine fire over 6 weeks, and unexposed residents of Sale, participated in the Hazelwood Health Study Respiratory Stream clinical assessments in 2021, including measurements of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) concentration, a marker of eosinophilic airway inflammation. Individual exposure to coal mine fire PM 2.5 was modelled and mapped to time-location diaries. The effect of exposure to PM 2.5 on log-transformed FeNO in exhaled breath was investigated using multivariate linear regression models in the entire sample and stratified by potentially vulnerable subgroups. Results A total of 326 adults (mean age: 57 years) had FeNO measured. The median FeNO level (interquartile range [IQR]) was 17.5 [15.0] ppb, and individual exposure to coal mine fire PM 2.5 was 7.2 [13.8] µg/m 3 . We did not identify evidence of association between coal mine fire PM 2.5 exposure and FeNO in the general adult sample, nor in various potentially vulnerable subgroups. The point estimates were consistently close to zero in the total sample and subgroups. Conclusion Despite previous short-term impacts on FeNO and respiratory health outcomes in the medium term, we found no evidence that PM 2.5 from the Hazelwood coal mine fire was associated with any long-term impact on eosinophilic airway inflammation.

Article activity feed