Performance Evaluation of Instrument-Based SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Fluorescent Immunoassays for Point-of-Care Detection

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Rapid antigen tests targeting SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein were essential for decentralised testing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Independent performance evaluations are critical to guide regulatory approval and implementation, particularly in resource-limited settings. This study presents a retrospective analytical and operational evaluation of two instrument-based fluorescent immunoassays (FIA): the PCL COVID-19 Ag Rapid FIA (PCL Inc., South Korea) and LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test (LumiraDx Ltd., UK). Analytical sensitivity was determined using recombinant nucleocapsid protein and viral cultures. Clinical performance was assessed using residual clinical specimens (n=110) with RT-PCR as reference, stratified by cycle threshold (Ct). Operational characteristics were assessed using a structured Likert framework. Overall sensitivity was 63% (51-73) for PCL and 95% (88-99) for LumiraDx. For Ct≤25, sensitivity increased to 93% and 100%. Specificity was ≥97% for both. LumiraDx maintained sensitivity (83-94%) at Ct 25-30, whereas PCL detected no positives in this range. Limit of detection was 0.039 nM (PCL) and 0.6 pM (LumiraDx). Operational usability was high for both (90% PCL, 87% LumiraDx). LumiraDx showed higher analytical sensitivity across a broader viral load range, supporting primary diagnostic use, whereas PCL was limited to high viral loads. This provides a reproducible framework for rapid diagnostic assessment during emerging outbreaks.

Article activity feed