Protocol to Control the Bedside Ultrasound-Guided Peripherally-Inserted Central Catheter-Related Infection in Elderly Intensive-Care-Unit Patients in a Small-Volume Center in Korea

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

We performed a retrospective analysis of the data from a total of 241 patients (n=241). A total of 161 (66.8%) patients received the peripherally-inserted central catheter (PICC) for long-term intravenous access, 172 (71.4%) had no past history of receiving catheters and 142 (58.9%) received the PICC on the right side. Target veins include basilic vein (42.7% [103/241]), brachial vein (41.9% [101/241]) and cephalic vein (15.4% [37/241]). There were a total of five cases (2.1%) of the PICC-related infection. Of these, one case (0.4%) was the PICC-related bloodstream infection; Candida parapsilosis was identified from both the PICC tip and blood samples. A total of 224 patients (92.9%) had optimal positions of the PICC tip. Male sex (OR 0.183; 95% CI 0.050-0.675, p=0.011), the length of a catheter (OR 0.794; 95% CI 0.657-0.960, p=0.017) and right side (OR 4.711; 95% CI 1.227-18.091, p=0.024) were significant risk factors of non-optimal positions of the catheter. Time-to-events are estimated at 56.02±1.37 days (95% CI 53.33-58.71). Here, we describe our single-center, retrospective experience with bedside ultrasound (US)-guided PICCs in elderly ICU patients in a small-volume center.

Article activity feed