Real-time ultrasound-guided vs. landmark-guided spinal anesthesia for scheduled cesarean delivery and door-to-skin incision time: a retrospective study (2019-2024)

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Real-time ultrasound can facilitate spinal anesthesia. However, it remains uncertain whether this technique prolongs the time for parturients entry into the operating room to skin incision compared with the landmark-guided method. We conducted a retrospective, propensity-score-matched study involving patients who received real-time and landmark-guided spinal anesthesia over a five-year period (2019-2024). Results showed a significantly time reduction from “door” to “skin incision” in the landmark-guided spinal anesthesia group compared to the real-time group (37.9 ± 13.7 minutes vs. 41.9 ± 18.3 minutes, P < 0.05). Both the age, body mass index and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification remained no significant correlation with the time reduction from “door” to “skin incision”.

Article activity feed