<span class="word">Diagnostic <span class="word">Performance <span class="word">of <span class="word">Interleukin-<span class="word">6 (<span class="word allCaps">IL-<span class="word">6) <span class="word">and <span class="word">Membrane <span class="word">Glycoprotein <span class="word">Cluster <span class="word">of <span class="word">Differentiation<span class="word">64 (<span class="word">CD64) <span class="word">for <span class="word">Acute <span class="word">Appendicitis <span class="word">in <span class="word">Girls <span class="word">Presenting <span class="word">with <span class="word">Lower <span class="word">Abdominal <span class="word">Pain: <span class="word"><span class="changedDisabled">A <span class="word">Case–<span class="word">Control <span class="word">Study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Abstract Background: Acute appendicitis in girls presenting with lower abdominal pain repre-sents a frequent diagnostic dilemma, given the overlap in clinical presentation with gynecological and non-surgical causes. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of IL-6 and CD64 and to compare them with classical inflammatory markers and the Alvarado score. Methods: We conducted an observational case–control study over a three-year period (December 2022–December 2025) at the First University Paediatric Surgery Clinic (General Hospital of Thessaloniki “Georgios Gen-nimatas”). Consecutive girls aged ≤16 years presenting with lower abdominal pain were included. The primary outcome was the presence of appendicitis (yes/no), defined by the final clinical diagnosis and, where applicable, intraoperative and/or histo-pathological confirmation. Diagnostic performance was assessed using ROC curves/AUC with 95% confidence intervals estimated by the DeLong method. The prespecified primary model was a logistic regression including the Alvarado score and log1p(IL-6). Results: Of 74 initially assessed cases, one was excluded (appendiceal neuroendocrine tumour, NET G1), yielding a final sample of 73 girls: 37 with appendi-citis and 36 without appendicitis. IL-6 was higher in the appendicitis group (median 19.41 vs 4.10 pg/mL) and showed moderate discrimination (AUC 0.696). CRP showed lower/borderline performance (AUC 0.595), whereas CD64 did not demonstrate useful discrimination (AUC 0.521). The Alvarado score had the highest discriminatory ability (AUC 0.885). Adding IL-6 to the Alvarado score did not materially improve the AUC in the common subset. Conclusions: IL-6 demonstrates moderate diagnostic perfor-mance as a standalone biomarker and may be useful as an adjunct, particularly when a clinical score is unavailable or unreliable. CD64 did not add diagnostic information in this setting. Larger, prespecified studies are required to identify clinically useful cut-offs.

Article activity feed