Finite Differences of Prime Powers as Cyclotomic Norms: A Structural Bridge from Nicomachus to Euler. Universal Anderson–Faulhaber–Bernoulli Identity: Internal Structure of Perfect Powers and Arithmetic Obstruction via Discrete Calculus

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

For every prime p and every integer a, the backward finite difference δp(a) := a^p − (a − 1)^p equals the cyclotomic binary form Φp(a, a − 1), where Φp(X, Y) is the homogenisation of the p-th cyclotomic polynomial, and hence equals the norm NQ(ζp)/Q(a − ζp(a − 1)). For p = 3 this specialises to the identity δ3(a) = NZ[ω](a − ω(a − 1)), where ω = e^(2πi/3), connecting the individual cubic finite difference obtained by differencing the classical sum formula of Nicomachus of Gerasa (~100 CE) with the Eisenstein norm that appears in Euler's factorisation of a^3 + b^3. We develop this identity in three directions: (a) General cyclotomic framework. For each prime p, every prime divisor q of δp(a) satisfies q ≡ 1 (mod p), imposing an arithmetic sieve whose density ~1/(p−1) grows increasingly severe with p. (b) Arithmetic density. The values {δ3(a)}a≥1 form a thin subfamily of the Löschian numbers (norms in Z[ω]), with counting function ~√(N/3) versus the Landau-Ramanujan asymptotic CN/√log N for all Löschian numbers up to N. (c) Three-language equivalence. For the cubic case we prove a precise equivalence among: (i) divisibility of δ3(a), (ii) multiplicative order modulo q, and (iii) splitting of q in Z[ω]. We also give an elementary proof of the base case 1 + b^3 = c^3 (no positive-integer solutions), and derive 3-adic constraints on any hypothetical solution to a^3 + b^3 = c^3 via the Lifting-the-Exponent Lemma, without invoking unique factorisation in Z[ω].

Article activity feed