Risk Factors and Clinical Manifestations of Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Children Previously Hospitalized for COVID-19 in Taiwan
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background: The clinical features and risk factors of post‑acute sequelae of SARS‑CoV‑2 infection (PASC) in children remain incomplete. This study aims to clarify the manifestations and identify predictors of PASC in pediatric patients previously hospitalized for COVID‑19. Methods: We conducted this retrospective cohort study at the China Medical University Children’s Hospital in Taiwan, including 143 children aged 3-18 hospitalized for the acute COVID-19 during the Omicron pandemic from April 2022 to July 2023. PASC was assessed through phone calls, online survey, and in-person follow-ups. Data encompassing demographics, clinical presentations, laboratory results, and acute-phase treatment were collected and compared between children with and without PASC. Each child was assigned total clinical scores based on the acute-phase symptoms and treatment. We evaluated the association of the total clinical scores with PASC among study children. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff for total clinical scores, which best differentiated occurrence of PASC. Results: Among the 143 discharged children, 35.7% (n = 51) developed PASC. Children with PASC tended to be older (mean age: 7.6 vs. 6.3 years, p = 0.05) and greater body weight (29.1 vs. 23.7 kg, p = 0.05). PASC children exhibited higher reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) cycle threshold (Ct) values (17.1 vs. 14.2, p = 0.04) during the acute phase than those without PASC. There were no significant disparities in other laboratory results, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stays, bacterial coinfections, oxygen supplementation, and medication usage between two groups. Notably, compared to the control group, the total clinical scores were significantly higher in the PASC group (37.9 vs. 31.5, p = 0.02), with an optimal cutoff value of 37.7 yielding an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.70. Conclusions: This study identified a significant proportion of children developing PASC following hospitalization for acute COVID-19. Older age, greater body weight, and larger RT-PCR Ct values during the acute phase emerged as potential risk factors for developing PASC. Moreover, the clinical scoring system constructed in this study may help to predict the risk of developing PASC after discharge.