No-Touch Adaptive Versus Conventional Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Localized Renal Tumours with High Nephrometry Complexity: A Comparative Analysis of Early Outcomes

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Surgical refinements in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) aim to reduce morbidity and optimize renal function preservation, particularly in patients with high-complexity renal tumours. This study describes the no-touch adaptive technique for RAPN and compares its perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, and early renal function with those of the conventional approach. Methods: A cohort of 72 consecutive patients with high-complexity renal tumours undergoing RAPN was evaluated. The study group included 38 patients treated with the no-touch adaptive technique, while 34 patients underwent the conventional approach. The no-touch adaptive technique consisted of sutureless, off-clamp simple tumour enucleation with incremental haemostasis and the option to shift to arterial clamping, tumour enucleoresection, or renorrhaphy as needed. The conventional technique involved on-clamp minimal enucleoresection with double-layer renorrhaphy. Outcomes assessed included completion of a fully no-touch procedure, perioperative metrics, 90-day postoperative complications, and 3-month renal function change from baseline. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. A fully no-touch RAPN was achieved in 30/38 (79%) patients. Adaptation was required in eight cases: shift to main arterial clamping (n=2), renorrhaphy (n=5), or both (n=1), with one conversion to total nephrectomy due to intractable bleeding. Estimated blood loss was similar between groups (study: 150 ml [IQR 75–250] vs. control: 180 ml [IQR 100–400]). Length of stay was significantly shorter in the study group (3 days [IQR 3–4]) compared with controls (5 days [IQR 6–8]). Any-grade 90-day complications were significantly lower with the no-touch technique (21% vs. 56%, p<0.01). Clinically significant 3-month eGFR decline occurred in 14% of controls versus 0% of study patients (p = 0.02). Conclusions: The no-touch adaptive RAPN technique is feasible in high-complexity renal tumours and provides reduced morbidity and superior early renal function preservation compared with the conventional approach.

Article activity feed