Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Beyond the Learning Curve: Does Prior Laparoscopic Experience Influence Surgical Outcomes?

Background/Objectives Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is widely used in contemporary prostate cancer surgery, although surgeons enter robotic practice through heterogeneous training pathways. This study aimed to compare early oncological and functional outcomes after RARP between two experienced robotic surgeons with different surgical backgrounds once the learning curve had been surpassed. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, consecutive, single-center study including patients undergoing RARP after completion of the learning curve (>40 cases) by two experienced robotic surgeons with different surgical backgrounds. Baseline characteristics, perioperative variables, and early oncological and functional outcomes were compared between surgeons. Pentafecta achievement was assessed as an exploratory composite outcome. Appropriate non-parametric and categorical statistical tests were applied. Results: Ninety-three patients were included (55 operated on by surgeon A and 38 by surgeon B). Preoperative clinical and pathological characteristics were largely comparable between groups, except for prostate volume. Median operative time was significantly shorter for surgeon A (70 vs. 120 minutes, p < 0.001). Postoperative morbidity was low, with no major complications and no differences in length of hospital stay. At 6 months, urinary continence and erectile function recovery rates were high and comparable between surgeons. Oncological outcomes, including positive surgical margin rates and biochemical recurrence, did not differ significantly, although recurrence events were infrequent and follow-up was limited. Overall pentafecta achievement was modest and similar between groups (23.6% vs. 21.1%, p = 0.77), with positive surgical margins emerging as the main limiting factor. Conclusions: In this exploratory post–learning curve analysis, early oncological and functional outcomes after RARP were similar between surgeons with different surgical backgrounds. These findings should be interpreted cautiously and considered hypothesis-generating.