Empirical Weakness of the Big Bang Theory and Evidence-Based Cosmology
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
The undeniable scientific fact is that time is information about the numerical order of changes that occur in the time-invariant space that we experience as the Now. Nothing could have happened in some distant physical past because it doesn't exist. We do not have single experimental evidence that time is a dimension in which the universe exists. That’s why the origin of the universe in some distant past is a philosophical-religious research topic. Appropriate scientific research methodology is how the universe we observe works. Astronomical observations confirm that SMBHs in the centre of galaxies throw into intergalactic space fresh energy for the formation of new stars in the form of astrophysical jets. SMBHs are rejuvenating systems of the universe. Evidence-based cosmology research methodology is superior to the Big Bang cosmology research methodology because it has no theoretical assumptions and is strictly empirical. It confirms that the observable universe rejuvenates itself.