Synergy and Attenuation of Work-Related Factors in Musculoskeletal Disorders: The Combined Risk Based on Data from the Korean Working Conditions Survey
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background and objectives: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) account for more than 60% of compensated occupational diseases in Korea. Despite this burden, benchmarks of standardized ergonomic exposure and evidence on the combined effects of risk factors remain limited. This study aimed to construct a body part–specific ergonomic job-exposure matrix (JEM) and evaluate the independent and interactive effects of ergo-nomic, demographic, and work-related factors. Materials and Methods: We analyzed the data of 210,500 workers from the 2nd–6th Korean Working Conditions Survey (2009–2020). A JEM for arms/neck, back, and legs was developed and validated (κ≥0.79). Logistic regression models estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs), and additive interactions were assessed using relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI), attributable proportion (AP), and the synergy index (SI). Results: High ergonomic exposure was strongly associated with MSDs across all body regions (aORs 2.3–2.5). Age >45 years, long working hours (>52 h), and high job strain also increased risks (aORs 1.4–2.3). On the additive scale, ergo-nomic risk combined with older age showed consistent synergy (RERI up to 1.5; SI >1.5), whereas combinations with long working hours or job strain showed attenuation (RERI < 0; SI < 1). Women reported higher crude prevalence but lower adjusted odds (aOR ≈0.9). Conclusions: This nationally representative study demonstrates that ergonomic risk, age, long working hours, and job strain are major determinants of MSDs. The validated Korean JEM provides a standardized tool for surveillance and compensation. However, the cross-sectional design limits causal inference. Future longitudinal research with objective exposure measures is needed to strengthen causal inference and guide tailored preven-tion.