Modeling Ranking Concordance, Dispersion, and Tail Extremes with a Joint Copula Framework

Rankings drive consequential decisions in science, sports, medicine, and business. Conventional evaluation methods typically analyze rank concordance, dispersion, and extremeness in isolation, inviting biased inference when these properties co-move. We introduce the Concordance–Dispersion–Extremeness Framework (CDEF), a copula-based audit that treats dependence among these properties as the object of interest. The CDEF automatically detects forced versus non-forced ranking regimes, then screens dispersion mechanics via χ2 tests that distinguish independent multinomial structures from without-replacement structures and, for forced dependent data, compares Mallows structures against appropriate baselines. The framework estimates upper-tail agreement between raters by fitting pairwise Gumbel copulas to mid-rank pseudo-observations, summarizing tail co-movement alongside Kendall’s W and mutual information, then reports likelihood-based summaries and decision rules that distinguish genuine from phantom agreement. Applied to pre-season college football rankings, the CDEF reinterprets apparently high concordance by revealing heterogeneity in pairwise tail dependence and dispersion patterns that inflate agreement under univariate analyses. In simulation, traditional Kendall’s W fails to distinguish scenarios, whereas the CDEF clearly separates Phantom from Genuine and Clustered agreement settings, clarifying when agreement stems from shared tail dependence rather than stable consensus. Rather than claiming probabilities from a monolithic trivariate model, the CDEF provides a transparent, regime-aware diagnosis that improves reliability assessment, surfaces bias, and supports sound decisions in settings where rankings carry real stakes.