Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI) Levels in Patients with Different Phenotypes of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background and Objectives: We aimed to compare visceral adiposity index (VAI) levels among polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) subtypes in this study. Matherials and Methods: A total of 180 PCOS patients and 51 controls were included. Patients were divided into the following subtypes: Phenotype A (n=96), clinical and/or biochemical hyperandrogenism (HA)+oligo-anovulation (OA)+polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM); Phenotype B (n=19), HA+OA; Phenotype C (n=35), HA+PCOM; and, Phenotype D (n=30), OA+PCOM. VAI was calculated for women by the following formula: (Waist circumference/[36.58+(1.89xBody mass index)])x[(triglyceride(mmol/L)/0.81)x(1.52xHigh density lipoprotein-cholesterol(mmol/L))]. Results: In the total PCOS patients, VAI levels were higher than controls [1.21 (0.39-10.89) and 0.85 (0.32-1.87), respectively] (p< 0.001). VAI levels were higher in Phenotype A [1.46 (0.39-10.89)] and Phenotype B [1.31 (0.43-4.39)] than in controls [0.85 (0.32-1.87)], and also higher in Phenotype A than in Phenotype C [1.00 (0.41-4.79)] and Phenotype D [1.01 (0.4-3.21)] (p=0.003 and p=0.001, respectively). While present in 38 patients (21.1%) in the PCOS group, there was no metabolic syndrome (MetS) in controls (p< 0.001). In Phenotypes A, B, and D, while more patients had MetS than controls (p< 0.001, 0.004, and 0.021, respectively), more patients had MetS in Phenotype A, compared to Phenotypes C and D (p=0.003 and p=0.021, respectively). Given ROC analysis, the VAI cut-off value in predicting MetS in the PCOS group was 1.66 (sensitivity: 94.74% and specificity: 83.1%). Conclusions: PCOS phenotypes characterized by HA and OA, particularly Phenotypes A and B, are associated with higher VAI values and an increased frequency of MetS, underscoring the importance of early metabolic assessment in these patient groups.

Article activity feed