Travel Distance and Its Impact on Wait Time for Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography in Patients with Cancers

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objectives: To examine travel distance and its impact on wait time for Positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with lung, lymphoma, and prostate cancers in Alberta. Methods: We used Alberta cancer registry and diagnostic imaging database to identify patients with lung, lymphoma, and prostate cancers who had a PET/CT scan during April 2017 and March 2023. Alberta Facilities Distance/Time Look Up Table was used to calculate travel distance from patient’s residence to PET/CT facility. Negative binomial regression was used to assess association between travel distance and wait time for PET/CT. Results: The study included 9,503 patients. Lung cancer accounted for 43.4% of patients, followed by lymphoma (37.1%) and prostate (19.5%) cancers. There were more female patients with lung (55.5%) than lymphoma (42.9%; p< 0.001) cancers. Mean (SD) age was 66.8 (13.8) years and lymphoma patients were younger (59.6 years) than lung (70.3 years; p< 0.001) or prostate (72.7 years; p< 0.001) patients. Diabetes (14.2%) was the most prevalent comorbidity. Median (IQR) travel distance was 21 (12-121) km and was shorter for urban (16 km) than rural (148 km; p< 0.001) patients, but wait time was similar (median=20 vs. 21 days; p=0.378). There were no significant associations between travel distance and wait time (IRR=1.00; p=0.108). The results were robust in subgroup analyses by type of cancer and scan priority. Conclusion: There were no associations between travel distance and wait time for PET/CT. Additional research is warranted to examine the potential impact of longer travel distance on overall access to care and patient outcomes.

Article activity feed