Whole-Body MRI vs. PET-CT in Pediatric Oncology: Enhancing Diagnostic Precision for Solid Tumors

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective Pediatric solid tumors represent a significant portion of childhood cancer cases, requiring accurate and comprehensive imaging for effective staging, treatment planning, and long-term monitoring. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) has emerged as a promising radiation-free alternative to traditional positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), offering superior soft tissue contrast without the risks associated with ionizing radiation. This study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of WB-MRI versus PET-CT in detecting primary tumors, metastases, and recurrences in pediatric solid tumors. Materials – Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 47 pediatric patients diagnosed with solid tumors between 2017 and 2020. Patients underwent both initial and follow-up imaging using PET-CT and WB-MRI. The study included cases with confirmed primary tumors, metastatic lesions, recurrences, and post-surgical negative findings. Patients who received chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery after their PET-CT examinations were excluded from the analysis. The diagnostic performance of both modalities was assessed and compared. Results Pathological findings, including primary tumors, metastases, and postoperative recurrences, were identified in 74% of patients through PET-CT imaging. WB-MRI demonstrated an overall diagnostic accuracy of 97.47% for detecting primary tumors, metastatic disease, and recurrences, with a sensitivity of 97.01% and a specificity of 100%. While WB-MRI proved highly effective in identifying primary tumors and recurrences, it showed limitations in detecting certain types of metastases compared to PET-CT. Nonetheless, WB-MRI provided comprehensive whole-body assessment without the associated radiation risks. Conclusions WB-MRI is a highly reliable and accurate diagnostic tool for evaluating pediatric solid tumors, offering a non-ionizing alternative to PET-CT. Incorporating advanced sequences, particularly Short Tau Inversion Recovery (STIR), enhances WB-MRI's sensitivity for detecting primary tumors, screening for metastases, and monitoring recurrences. Given its superior safety profile and diagnostic accuracy, WB-MRI is recommended as a first-line imaging modality in pediatric oncology to optimize diagnostic outcomes and reduce radiation exposure in young patients.

Article activity feed