Comparison of the Efficacy of Postcesarean Analgesia by Combination of Intraperitoneal Instillation of Local Anaesthetics, Rectus Aponeurosis Infiltration and Infiltration Through the Wound Site Versus Intratechal Morphine: Prospective, Randomised, Double-Blind Study

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Cesarean section is a common surgical procedure, and effective postoperative pain management is crucial. This study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of intraperitoneal local anesthetic (IPLA), rectus aponeurosis infiltra-tion (RAI), and local anesthetic wound infiltration (LWI) with intrathecal morphine (ITM) in elective cesarean sections under spinal anesthesia. Methods: A total of 46 pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned to two equal groups: LWI+RAI+IPLA and Morphine. Both groups received spinal anesthesia with 0.5% bupiva-caine and 15 µg fentanyl, while the Morphine group also received 150 µg morphine. The LWI+RAI+IPLA group was administered 30 mL of local anesthetic solution postoperatively. The primary outcome was total morphine consump-tion within 24 hours, and secondary outcomes included pain scores and opioid-related side effects. Results: Except for height (p=0.023), demographic characteristics were similar. No significant differences were observed in pain scores (p > 0.05) or morphine consumption (p=0.075). However, pruritus was significantly higher in the Morp-hine group (p=0.032). Nausea and vomiting occurred in 30.4% of Group M and 8.7% of Group LWI+RAI+IPLA, while pruritus affected 34.8% and 8.7%, respectively. Conclusions: Local anesthetic infiltration and peritoneal instillation provided comparable analgesia to ITM while reducing opioid-related side effects.

Article activity feed