A Retrospective Cohort Study on the Side Effects of Intrathecal Morphine Administration Combined with General Anaesthesia Versus General Anaesthesia Alone in Prostatectomy Patients

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background and aims: Prostatectomy is a common surgical procedure for prostate cancer, the most frequently diagnosed cancer in the male population. The choice of anaesthetic technique has a significant impact on postoperative pain management. The changes in recommendations between 2015 and 2021 prompted this study to evaluate the impact of intrathecal morphine administration in combination with general anaesthesia compared to general anaesthesia alone on postoperative analgesic consumption and associated side effects. Material and Methods: A single center retrospective cohort study was conducted, analysing data from 202 patients who underwent prostatectomy between 2015 and 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: 147 patients received intrathecal morphine combined with general anaesthesia, while 49 patients received general anaesthesia alone. Key postoperative parameters, including Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores, analgesic consumption, and side effects (e.g., nausea, pruritus, hypotension, respiratory depres-sion) were evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed using Mann-Whitney U-tests and multiple regression models. Results: The group receiving intrathecal morphine showed a significant decrease in NRS pain scores at rest and during movement (p < 0.001). The need for postoperative analgesics, especially opioids such as piritramide, was reduced in this group. No significant increase in serious side effects such as respiratory depression was observed. Conclusion: The present study investigates the potential of intrathecal morphine combined with general anaesthesia as a promising approach to improve pain management in prostatectomy patients. By reducing pain intensity, this method shows significant clinical benefits. In addition, the absence of a significant increase in serious adverse events reinforces the safety of this approach. However, further studies are warranted to assess long-term outcomes and explore optimal dosing strategies. The re-introduction of this anaesthetic technique has great potential to improve patient recovery and satisfaction following major surgery.

Article activity feed