Precision and Progress: Evaluating the Role of Robotic Surgery Gastric Cancer Treatment – A Comprehensive Review by TROGSS – The Robotic Global Surgical Society & EFISDS - European Federation International Society for Digestive Surgery Joint Working Group

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Introduction: Robotic-assisted minimally invasive gastrectomy (RAMIG) rep- resents a significant advancement in the surgical management of gastric cancer, offering superior dexterity, enhanced visualization, and improved ergonomics compared to lapa- roscopic gastrectomy (LG). This review systematically evaluates the current evidence on perioperative outcomes, oncological efficacy, learning curves, and economic considera- tions, providing insights into RAMIG’s potential role in modern gastric cancer surgery. Methods: A thorough analysis of retrospective, prospective, and meta-analytic studies was conducted to compare RAMIG with LG. Key outcomes, including operative time, in- traoperative blood loss, lymph node retrieval, postoperative complications, learning curve duration, and cost-effectiveness, were assessed. Emphasis was placed on both short- term and long-term oncological outcomes to determine the clinical value of RAMIG. Re- sults: Evidence indicates that RAMIG is associated with reduced intraoperative blood loss, lower morbidity rates, and a shorter learning curve, with proficiency achieved after 11–25 cases compared to 40–60 cases for LG. The robotic platform’s articulated instru- ments and enhanced three-dimensional visualization enable more precise lymphadenec- tomy, particularly in complex anatomical regions. Despite these advantages, operative time remains longer, and costs remain higher due to system acquisition, maintenance, and consumable expenses. However, emerging data suggest a gradual narrowing of cost dis- parities. While short-term outcomes are favorable, further high-quality, multicenter stud- ies are needed to validate long-term oncological efficacy and survival outcomes. Conclu- sion: RAMIG offers significant technical and clinical advantages over conventional LG, particularly in terms of precision and learning efficiency. However, the long-term onco- logical benefits and economic feasibility require further validation. Future research should focus on cost optimization, advanced technological integration such as near-infrared flu- orescence and artificial intelligence, and multicenter trials to solidify RAMIG’s role as a standard approach for gastric cancer surgery.

Article activity feed