A Note on Fermat's Last Theorem
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
In 1637, Pierre de Fermat asserted that the equation an + bn = cn has no positive integer solutions for any exponent n > 2, famously claiming to possess a proof too large for the margin. Although Andrew Wiles established the full theorem in 1994 using deep methods from algebraic geometry and modular forms, the possibility of a more elementary argument has remained a topic of enduring interest. In this work we give a classical proof of the nonexistence of solutions to the Fermat equation for prime exponents under a natural local constraint: we assume that for an odd prime p, any hypothetical primitive solution triple (a, b, c) to ap + bp = cp satisfies a + b − c < 2p. The proof proceeds by establishing that the difference δ = a + b − c must satisfy δ ≥ 2p, thereby contradicting the hypothesis. This follows from three elementary observations: first, by the binomial theorem, (a + b)p > ap + bp = cp, ensuring δ > 0; second, by Fermat’s Little Theorem applied modulo p, we have p | δ, yielding δ ≥ p; third, parity considerations force 2 | δ, which combined with δ ≥ p gives δ ≥ 2p. The argument relies solely on elementary number theory and congruence techniques, remaining close to the arithmetic framework available in Fermat’s time.