High diversity in Delta variant across countries revealed by genome‐wide analysis of SARS‐CoV‐2 beyond the Spike protein
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.09.01.458647: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources To check the effect size, Cohen ‘s d was calculated (Equation 2).where, M: mean, n: sample size, SD: standard deviation Probability distributions of pairwise cosine similarities were calculated by binning frequencies (bins = 25), and their Jensen-Shannon divergence (with base 2) was calculated using the jensenshannon function available in SciPy [v1.7.0]31. p-value was calculated using bootstrapping with 1000 iterations. SciPysuggested: (SciPy, RRID:SCR_008058)For calculating 95% confidence interval, we calculated Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD) and Cohen ‘s d for each bootstrap iteration. Co…SciScore for 10.1101/2021.09.01.458647: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources To check the effect size, Cohen ‘s d was calculated (Equation 2).where, M: mean, n: sample size, SD: standard deviation Probability distributions of pairwise cosine similarities were calculated by binning frequencies (bins = 25), and their Jensen-Shannon divergence (with base 2) was calculated using the jensenshannon function available in SciPy [v1.7.0]31. p-value was calculated using bootstrapping with 1000 iterations. SciPysuggested: (SciPy, RRID:SCR_008058)For calculating 95% confidence interval, we calculated Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD) and Cohen ‘s d for each bootstrap iteration. Cohensuggested: NoneResults from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:This study has a few limitations. Since this study is based on publicly available data from the GISAID database, it may carry biases associated with sequencing disparities across countries and reporting delays. Though there is extensive genomic surveillance, there is a lack of clinical annotation of the genomes, limiting our ability to assess the clinical impact of the country-specific differences in the variants. The GISAID database does not record mutations in the recently discovered ORFs in the SARS-CoV-2 genome such as ORF10, ORF9b, and ORF9c. The assignment of the mutations in these ORFs may reveal further differences between SARS-CoV-2 variants. Though mass vaccination efforts are underway around the world, there are huge differences in the population immunity of countries due to the differences in the vaccines approved regionally and the extent of vaccination coverage in populations. These differences contribute to the risk of emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants and continued genome-surveillance is imperative for developing comprehensive global and country-specific preventive and therapeutic measures to end the ongoing pandemic.
Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No funding statement was detected.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-