SARS‐CoV‐2 sensing by RIG‐I and MDA5 links epithelial infection to macrophage inflammation
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
- @AilisDr's saved articles (AilisDr)
Abstract
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.12.23.424169: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: The study was approved by the joint University College London/University College London Hospitals NHS Trust Human Research Ethics Committee and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Consent: The study was approved by the joint University College London/University College London Hospitals NHS Trust Human Research Ethics Committee and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Cell Line Authentication not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources Cells were then incubated with 1μg/ml CR3009 … SciScore for 10.1101/2020.12.23.424169: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: The study was approved by the joint University College London/University College London Hospitals NHS Trust Human Research Ethics Committee and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Consent: The study was approved by the joint University College London/University College London Hospitals NHS Trust Human Research Ethics Committee and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Cell Line Authentication not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources Cells were then incubated with 1μg/ml CR3009 SARS-CoV-2 cross-reactive antibody (a kind gift from Dr. Laura McCoy,) in permeabilisation buffer for 30 min at room temperature, washed once and incubated with secondary Alexa Fluor 488-Donkey-anti-Human IgG (Jackson Labs). 488-Donkey-anti-Human IgGsuggested: NoneA blocking step was carried out for 1h at room temperature with 10% goat serum/1%BSA in PBS. Nucleocapsid (N) proten detection was performed by primary incubation with human anti-N antibody (Cr3009, 1ug/ml) for 18h, and washed thoroughly in PBS. anti-Nsuggested: NoneCr3009suggested: NonePrimary antibodies were detected by labelling with with secondary anti-human AlexaFluor488 and anti-rabbit AlexaFluor546 conjugates (Jackson Immuno Research) for 1h. anti-rabbitsuggested: NoneExperimental Models: Cell Lines Sentences Resources Vero.E6 were provided by NIBSC, Beas2B (ATCC CRL-9609) and Hulec5a (ATCC CRL-3244) were obtained from ATCC, and Detroit 562 (ATCC CCL-138) were a kind gift from Dr Caroline Weight (UCL). Hulec5asuggested: ATCC Cat# CRL-3244, RRID:CVCL_0A11)THP-1 cells were cultured in RPMI (Gibco) supplemented with 10 heat-inactivated FBS (Labtech) THP-1suggested: NoneCaco-2 and Calu-3 cells were stimulated for 24 h with media containing TLR4 agonist Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (Peprotech), the TLR3 agonist poly I:C (Peprotech) or the TLR7 agonist R837 (Invivogen), using the concentration stated on each figure. Calu-3suggested: NoneVirus culture and infection: SARS-CoV-2 strain BetaCoV/Australia/VIC01/2020 (NIBSC) was propagated by infecting Caco-2 cells at MOI 0.01 TCID50/cell, in DMEM supplemented with 2% FBS at 37°C. Caco-2suggested: NoneVirus titres were determined by 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) on Vero.E6 cells. Vero.E6suggested: JCRB Cat# JCRB1819, RRID:CVCL_YQ49)Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources All samples were acquired on a BD Fortessa X20 or LSR II using BD FACSDiva software. BD FACSDivasuggested: (BD FACSDiva Software, RRID:SCR_001456)Data was analysed using FlowJo v10 (Tree Star). FlowJosuggested: (FlowJo, RRID:SCR_008520)Image analysis: NF-κB, IRF3, IL6 and GAPDH raw image channels were pre-processed using a batch rolling ball background correction in FIJI imagej software package (Schindelin et al., 2012) prior to quantification. imagejsuggested: (ImageJ, RRID:SCR_003070)Statistical analysis: Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism. GraphPad Prismsuggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: Please consider improving the rainbow (“jet”) colormap(s) used on page 29. At least one figure is not accessible to readers with colorblindness and/or is not true to the data, i.e. not perceptually uniform.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-