Sex Differences in Lung Imaging and SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Responses in a COVID-19 Golden Syrian Hamster Model

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Abstract

Men experience more severe outcomes from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) than women. Golden Syrian hamsters were used to explore sex differences in the pathogenesis of a human clinical isolate of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.04.02.438292: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    RandomizationAnimals were randomly assigned to be euthanized at 2, 4, 7, 14, or 28-days post infection (dpi).
    BlindingThe investigators were blinded to the group assignments.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variableAnimal experiments: Male and female golden Syrian hamsters (7-8 weeks of age) were purchased from Envigo (Haslett, MI).
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Antibody ELISAs: Hamster antibody ELISA protocol was modified from human COVID-19 antibody ELISA protocol described previously (14).
    COVID-19
    suggested: None
    After washing plates 3 times, HRP-conjugated secondary IgG (1:10000, Abcam, MA, USA), IgA (1:250, Brookwood Biomedical, AL, USA) or IgM (1:250, Brookwood Biomedical, AL, USA) antibodies were added.
    HRP-conjugated secondary IgG
    suggested: (Creative Diagnostics Cat# LAB-22, RRID:AB_2489589)
    IgA
    suggested: None
    IgM
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    To obtain whole inactivated SARS-CoV-2, VeroTMPRSS2 cells were infected at a MOI of 0.01 and the infected cell culture supernatant was collected at 72 hours post infection.
    VeroTMPRSS2
    suggested: JCRB Cat# JCRB1818, RRID:CVCL_YQ48)
    Briefly, tissue homogenates were 10-fold serially diluted in infection media (CM with 2.5% instead of 10% FBS), transferred in sextuplicate into the 96-well plates confluent with Vero-E6-TMPRSS2 cells, incubated at 370C for 4 days, and stained with naphthol blue-black solution for visualization.
    Vero-E6-TMPRSS2
    suggested: JCRB Cat# JCRB1819, RRID:CVCL_YQ49)
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Statistical Analyses: Statistical analyses were done in GraphPad Prism 9.
    GraphPad Prism
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: We found the following clinical trial numbers in your paper:

    IdentifierStatusTitle
    NCT04359329RecruitingEstrogen Patch for COVID-19 Symptoms
    NCT04539626RecruitingEstrogen Therapy in Non-severe COVID-19 Patients


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • No conflict of interest statement was detected. If there are no conflicts, we encourage authors to explicit state so.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.