Comparative transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2, influenza virus, and common human coronaviruses in the post-pandemic era: a community- and household-based prospective cohort study in China
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Despite continuous viral evolution, it remains unclear whether SARS-CoV-2 has transitioned to transmission dynamics resembling those of other endemic respiratory pathogens in the post-pandemic era. During 2023–2025, we compared post-pandemic SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility with influenza virus (IFV) and common human coronaviruses (HCoV) transmissibility and SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility during and after the pandemic. Among 7,399 participants in 1,764 households, there were 704 acute-respiratory-infection index cases and 2,684 household contacts. Healthcare-seeking was higher for SARS-CoV-2 (17.6%) and IFV (28.1%) than HCoVs (9.8%). Post-pandemic SARS-CoV-2 household secondary attack risk (HSAR) (7.9%) was comparable to IFV (7.0%) and higher than HCoV (4.4%;P<0.05). Older adults had highest SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV transmissibility; children had highest IFV transmissibility, correlated with peak viral loads. Post-pandemic SARS-CoV-2 HSAR was lower than pandemic-period Omicron HSAR (adjusted odds ratio:3.30;95%CI:1.82–5.98) and Delta-period HSAR (aOR:2.46;95%CI:1.27–4.79). Pre-symptomatic transmission was observed for all three pathogens, highest for SARS-CoV-2 (35.7%). Our findings indicate that SARS-CoV-2 maintains high household transmissibility and requires substantial medical resources in the post-pandemic era, and non-pharmaceutical interventions and vaccination strategies that account for age-specific transmissibility and susceptibility merit study and consideration.